IS A CONFIDENCE AND SUPPLY AGREEMENT A THREAT
TO WESTMINSTER DEMOCRACY?
THE CASE OF THE 2017 AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CONSERVATIVE PARTY
AND DEMOCRATIC UNIONIST PARTY
The article is an attempt of a theoretical reflection on the agreements signed by
two parties, with different relevance in political systems, in order to create a base of
support for a minority government. The author try to answer the question whether
such an agreement – in terms of transparency of a political system – is functional or dysfunctional for the stability of the Westminster democracy. He analyses
the case of the 2017 agreement between the Conservative Party and Democratic
Unionist Party using some system analysis and content analysis techniques. He
concludes that in the case of the United Kingdom the process of forming an
informal coalition in order to support the Theresa May’s minority government was
typical for the democratic system, but the transactional nature of the agreement
brought the British political system closer to patron-client patterns.
PEER REVIEW INFORMATION
Article has been screened for originality
ЛИТЕРАТУРА(29)
1.
A. Antoszewski, Tworzenie i utrzymanie koalicji gabinetowych, [w:] A. Antoszewski, R. Herbut (red.), Demokracje zachodnioeuropejskie. Analiza porównawcza, Wrocław 2008.
Confidence and Supply Agreement between the Conservative and Unionist Party and the Democratic Unionist Party, https://www.gov.uk/government/... (dostęp: 12.09.2017).
S. Cushion, R. Thomas, O. Ellis, Interpreting UKIP’s ‘Earthquake’in British Politics: UK Television News Coverage of the 2009 and 2014 EU Election Campaigns, „The Political Quarterly” 2015, vol. 86, nr 2.
M. Debus, Portfolio allocation and policy compromises: How and why the Conservatives and the Liberal Democrats formed a coalition government, „The Political Quarterly” 2011, vol. 82, nr 2.
E. Evans, E. Sanderson-Nash, From Sandals to Suits: Professionalisation, Coalition and the Liberal Democrats, „The British Journal of Politics and International Relations” 2011, vol. 13, nr 4.
M.J. Goodwin, O. Heath, The 2016 Referendum, Brexit and the Left Behind: An Aggregate-level Analysis of the Result, „The Political Quarterly” 2016, vol. 87, nr 3.
Z. Greene, Working through the issues: how issue diversity and ideological disagreement influence coalition duration, „European Political Science Review” 2017, vol. 9, nr 4.
O. Heath, M. Goodwin, The 2017 General Election, Brexit and the Return to Two-Party Politics: An Aggregate-Level Analysis of the Result, „The Political Quarterly” 2017, vol. 88, nr 3.
T. Heppell, Cameron and Liberal Conservatism: Attitudes within the Parliamentary Conservative Party and Conservative Ministers, „The British Journal of Politics and International Relations” 2013, vol. 15, nr 3.
C. Johnson, A. Middleton, Junior coalition parties in the British context: Explaining the Liberal Democrat collapse at the 2015 general election, „Electoral Studies” 2016, vol. 43.
A. Paun, A. Hibben, Supplying confidence: How confidence and supply agreements between minority governments and smaller parties work, London 2017, https://www.instituteforgovern... (dostęp: 12.09.2017).
A. Rusinowska, H. de Swart, Negotiating a Stable Government: An Application of Bargaining Theory to a Coalition Formation Model, „Group Decision and Negotiation” 2008, vol. 17, nr 5.
S.R. Shenhav, O. Oshri, D. Ofek, T. Sheafer, Story Coalitions: Applying Narrative Theory to the Study of Coalition Formation: Story Coalitions, „Political Psychology” 2014, vol. 35, nr 5.
J. Tonge, Supplying Confidence or Trouble? The Deal Between the Democratic Unionist Party and the Conservative Party, „The Political Quarterly” 2017, vol. 88, nr 3.
Мы используем файлы cookies для улучшения пользовательского интерфейса и анализа трафика. Данные собираются и обрабатываются нами и Google Analytics (more). Вы можете изменить настройки cookies в своем браузере. Продолжая использовать сайт, вы соглашаетесь с этими условиями.