PL EN RU
The Role of the Administrative Action Types in the Context of Exercising the Right to a Court
 
 
More details
Hide details
1
Member of The Chamber of Advocates of the Republic of Armenia, Ph.D. student at the Chair of Civil Procedure at Yerevan State University, Republic of Armenia
 
 
Publication date: 2024-09-20
 
 
Studia Politologiczne 2024;73
 
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
The article tries to bring to the light the specifics of exercising the right to apply to the court within the frameworks of the action types in administrative proceedings in general, deeply analyzing Armenian practice within the framework of international best practice. Defining the types of action in administrative proceedings as a procedural mode of case investigation is important for the proper investigation of the claim, but it cannot predetermine whether the claim is subject to examination in the court or not. In the light of the above, the subject of this study is the essence of the administrative action, the purpose of defining the action types, their influence on the investigation of the case, both in practice and in the theoretical literature, within the framework of the principle of finding out the factual circumstances of the case ex officio specific to administrative proceedings, the powers of the court when filing an inappropriate type of action and its consequences on the investigation of the case. The administrative procedural process starts upon submitting an administrative action, but the nature of the administrative action is manifested with some features, due to the legal mechanisms of exercising the right to apply to the administrative court and various judicial-scientific interpretations.
PEER REVIEW INFORMATION
Article has been screened for originality
REFERENCES (10)
1.
Bedevyan H., Problems of distribution of cargo evidence on claims obligations in administrative proceedings, «State and Law», Yerevan 2019, No. 2–3.
 
2.
Cananea G.D., Requirements of Administrative Procedure, due process of law beyond the state, 2016, Oxford University Press 2016.
 
3.
Detterbeck S., General Administrative Law with Law of Administrative Court Procedure, Munich 2014.
 
4.
Fadeeva I.V., Lakhtina T.A., Administrative claim as a means of protecting public rights and resolving an administrative legal dispute, «Bulletin of Economic Security» 2017, No. 2 [И.В. Фадеева, Т.А. Лахтина, Административный иск как средство защиты публичных прав и разрешения административно-правового спора, «Вестник экономической безопасности» 2017, No. 2].
 
5.
Galligan D.J., Discretionary Powers, Oxford: Clarendon Press 1986.
 
6.
Konstanty A., Comparative legal analysis of types of claims in administrative proceedings of Ukraine and foreign countries, «Legea Si Viata», September 2014. [А. Константый, Сравнительно-правовой анализ видов исков в административном судопроизводстве Украины и зарубежных государств, «Legea Si Viata», сентябрь 2014].
 
7.
Kramer U., Hinrichsen T., German Law of Administrative Court Procedure: An Overview, «Journal of Siberian Federal University, Humanities & Social Sciences» 2015, No. 8 (10).
 
8.
Skitovich V.V., Judicial control over the legality of the actions of officials: Author’s abstract. dis… cand. legal Sci., Moscow 1983 [В.В. Скитович, Судебный контроль за законностью действий должностных лиц: Автореф. дис… канд. юрид. наук. – М. 1983].
 
9.
Toropov A.V., Claim form in administrative proceedings: new in legislation, «Administrative and municipal law» 2014, № 4 [А.В. Торопов, Исковая форма в административном судопроизводстве: новое в законодательстве, «Административное и муниципальное право» 2014, № 4].
 
10.
Yesayan V., The principle of management and management actions in civil proceedings, Yerevan 2015.
 
ISSN:1640-8888
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top