PL EN RU
PRIVATIZATION OF POLITICS. A FAMILY POLITICAN
 
 
More details
Hide details
1
kierownik Zakładu Komunikacji Społecznej na WNPiD UAM
 
 
Publication date: 2019-12-20
 
 
Studia Politologiczne 2017;45
 
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
Personalization as a category describing changes in political communication appeared in political science and media literature two decades ago, becoming one of the key categories in explaining the processes of this change. An essential component of personalization is privatization, understood as the creation of private persona by politicians. This becomes the basis for creating an image that in the world of mediated politics becomes a critical factor in electoral success. The article presents the institutional phenomenon of the privatization of Polish politics after the change of the political system, which wrote anew the rules of political rivalry and encouraged politicians to use marketing strategies in communicating with voters. Specifically, it argues that a politician’s family is an indispensable tool for achieving their institutional and electoral goals.
PEER REVIEW INFORMATION
Article has been screened for originality
 
REFERENCES (19)
1.
M. Balmas, G. Rahat, T. Sheafer, S.R. Shenhav, Two routes to personalized politics: Centralized and decentralized personalization, “Party Politics” 2012, vol. 20 (1).
 
2.
P. Bourdieu, J.B. Thompson, Language and Symbolic Power, Boston 1991.
 
3.
P. Bourdieu, L.J.D. Wacquant, Zaproszenie do socjologii refleksyjnej, Warszawa 2001.
 
4.
J. Corner, Mediated persona and political culture. Dimensions of structure and process, “European Journal of Cultural Studies” 2000, Vol. 3, Issue 3.
 
5.
O. Driessens, K. Raeymaeckers, H. Verstraeten, S. Vandenbussche, Personalization according to politicians: A practice theoretical analysis of mediatization, “Communications” 2010, vol. 30 (35).
 
6.
A. Dudek, Historia polityczna Polski 1989–2012, Kraków 2013.
 
7.
D. Horton, R., Mass Communication and Para-Social Interaction. Observations on intimacy at a distance, [w:] C. Rojek (ed.), Celebrity. Critical Concepts in Sociology, London 2010.
 
8.
C. Jung, Archetypy i nieświadomość zbiorowa, Warszawa 2012.
 
9.
M. Kolczyński, Strategia wysokiego ryzyka – wyborczy rebranding Jarosława Kaczyńskiego, „Studia Politologiczne” 2010, nr 19.
 
10.
S. Koper, Kobiety władzy PRL, Warszawa 2013.
 
11.
A.I. Langer, The Politicization of Private Persona: Exceptional Leaders or the New Rule? The Case of the United Kingdom and the Blair Effect, “International Journal of Press/Politics” 2010, Vol. 15, Issue 1.
 
12.
M. Mateja, Między newsem a mitem. Prasa wobec śmierci polityka, Toruń 2015.
 
13.
M. Mazur, Polityka z twarzą. Personalizacja parlamentarnych kampanii wyborczych w Polsce w latach 1993–2011, Katowice 2014.
 
14.
I. McAllister, The Personalization of Politics, [w:] R.J. Dalton, H.-D. Klingemann (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Political Behavior, Oxford 2007.
 
15.
W. Patrzałek, Struktura przekaz reklamowego jako komunikatu perswazyjnego, [w:] W. Patrzałek (red.), Kreowanie i zmiana współczesnego przekazu reklamowego, Poznań-Wrocław 2012.
 
16.
D. Piontek, Kampania w zastępstwie. Prezydencka kampania wyborcza w Polsce w 2010 roku. „Athenaeum” 2011, nr 27.
 
17.
D. Piontek, Komunikowanie polityczne i kultura popularna. Tabloidyzacja informacji o polityce, Poznań 2011.
 
18.
R. van Santen, L. van Zoonen, Popularization and Personalization in Political Communication. A Conceptual Analysis. Conference Papers, ICA, 2009 Annual Meeting.
 
19.
R. van Santen, L. van Zoonen, The personal in political television biographies, „Biography” 2010.
 
ISSN:1640-8888
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top