Political Culture of Polish Society
Więcej
Ukryj
1
Professor at the Institute of Political Science, University of Warsaw
Data publikacji: 27-12-2019
Studia Politologiczne 2014;31
SŁOWA KLUCZOWE
STRESZCZENIE
New phenomena have appeared in the political culture of the Polish society and
they have both good and bad sides. Certain values and models of behaviour are
the factors that stimulate the system reforms and promote the formation of
consolidated democracy, while some have dysfunctional effects. It can be said on
the example of trust in public institutions that changes in political culture have
occurred within the axiological and evaluative-affective component. The citizens’
demands towards politicians increased and criticism in assessing them grew. This
can be a factor stimulating the quality of democracy. A certain temporary crisis in
social trust in Polish parliament can be felt. This is the worse side of the ongoing
processes. However, this does not mean that Polish society rejects pluralistic
democracy and its mechanisms. On the other hand, a considerable part of the
political elites are assessed negatively since – in the opinion of many citizens –
they do not meet the standards required by developed parliamentary democracy.
The role of the new media in political communication is growing and this
is going to be a factor affecting political culture. The new possibilities should
potentially facilitate the processes of improving the way of the functioning of the
democratic system, if only through stimulating the public debate. However, at
present it is more likely that the growth of the Internet use in the sphere of politics
and the development of political culture will proceed according to a scenario called
technorealism20. It means that people who are active in various domains of social
life, including the sphere of politics, and who use the Internet will have bigger
and better chances to acquire and create information on political subjects. The
possibilities of the Internet, on the other hand, will not make people who are not
very active and who are not interested in politics get interested in this sphere of
social life and participate in it. Besides, a considerable part of the citizens do not
use the Internet. This group can be called a group of digital marginalization. For
them, the possibilities of information and political participation created by the
new media are still a utopia.
REFERENCJE (12)
1.
Almond G.A., Communism and Political Culture Theory, “Comparative Politics” 1983, vol. 15, No. 2.
2.
Bouckaert G. and Van de Walle S., Comparing Measures of Citizen Trust and User Satisfaction as Indicators of Good Governance: Difficulties in Linking Trust and Satisfaction Indicators, “International Review of Administative Sciences” 2003, Vol. 69, No. 3.
3.
Dahrendorf R., Rozważania nad rewolucją w Europie, Warszawa 1991.
4.
Garlicki J., Kultura polityczna młodzieży studenckiej, Warszawa 1991.
5.
Garlicki J., The Political Culture of Polish Society, [in:] S. Sulowski (ed.), The Political System of Poland, Warsaw 2007.
6.
Garlicki J., Traditions and Dynamics in the Political Culture of Polish Society, [in:] J. Błuszkowski, S. Sulowski (eds.), Dillemas of Polish Transformation, Warsaw 2010.
7.
Garlicki J., Noga-Bogomilski A., Kultura polityczna w społeczeństwie demokratycznym, Warszawa 2004.
8.
Janowski K.B., Kultura polityczna Polaków u progu XXI wieku, [in:] K.B. Janowski (ed.), Kultura polityczna Polaków, Toruń 2010.
9.
Offe C., Drogi transformacji. Doświadczenia wschodnioeuropejskie i wschodnioniemieckie, Warszawa–Kraków 1999.
10.
Putnam R., Demokracja w działaniu, Kraków 1996.
11.
Sztompka P., Zaufanie, nieufność i dwa paradoksy demokracji, [in:] P. Sztompka, P. Kucia (eds.), Socjologia. Lektury, Kraków 2005.
12.
Ziółkowski M., Cztery funkcje pamięci społecznej (przypadek Polski), [in:] A. Kodera, K.Z. Sowa (ed.), Los i wybór. Dziedzictwo i perspektywy społeczeństwa polskiego. Pamiętnik XI Ogólnopolskiego Zjazdu Socjologicznego, Rzeszów 2003.