POLITICAL PARTIES AND THEIR GOVERNMENTS IN THE FACE OF ECONOMIC
GROWTH AND ECONOMIC REFORMS IN THE CENTRAL-EAST EUROPEAN
COUNTRIES SINCE 1990
1
EUROREG Centrum Europejskich
Studiów Regionalnych i Lokalnych, Uniwersytet Warszawski
Дата публикации: 2019-12-24
Studia Politologiczne 2015;35
КЛЮЧЕВЫЕ СЛОВА:
СТАТЬЯ:
For realization plans of research five hypotheses were selected and verified. The
results are described below.
1. Ideological differences of governments (left, right, centre) coexist with different
indicators of economy.
2. Two pro-growth strategies; a) stimulation via budget and little pressure on
reforms or b) high pressure on reforms, have statistical support, but more
efficient is the second one.
3. The larger political power of the government (obtained votes) and the more
stable is the government, the greater advancement of reforms and a relatively
higher economic growth.
4. The higher the political power of centre and right parties, (participation in
government weighted by number of days), the more advanced reforms and
relatively higher economic growth.
5. Left parties are slightly less willing to quick implementation of reforms than
right and centre parties.
PEER REVIEW INFORMATION
Article has been screened for originality
ЛИТЕРАТУРА (33)
1.
J.T. Addison, C. Schnabel, International Handbook of Trade Unions, Massachusets 2003.
2.
K. Armingeon, D. Weisstanner, S. Engler, P. Potolidis, M. Gerber, Comparative Political Data Set III 1990–2010, University of Berne 2012.
3.
T. Beck, G. Clarke, A. Groff, P. Keefer, P. Walsh, New tools in comparative political economy: The Database of Political Institutions, „World Bank Economic Review” 2001, September.
4.
C. Boix, Political Parties. Growth and Equality. Conservative and Social democratic Economic Strategies in the World Economy, Cambridge University Press 1998.
5.
R. Capello, G. Perucca, Do Eastern Regions Move Towards an Endogenous Growth Pattern? A Diachronic Perspective of Regional Success Factors, 7th Framework Programme, GRINCOH Deliverable n. P1.15, 2013.
6.
Forecat 2012 Forecasts, Macro Data, Transition Indicators, http://www.ebrd.com/pages/rese... (dostęp: 20.01.2013).
7.
G. Garett, Partisan Politics in the Global Economy, Cambidge University Press 1998.
8.
J. Gardawski, Współczesny neokorporatyzm w ujęciu socjologii ekonomicznej, [w:] W. Pacho (red.), Szkice ze współczesnej teorii ekonomii, Warszawa 2005.
9.
F. Grotz, T. Weber, Party Systems and Government Stability in Central and Eastern Europe, „World Politics” 2002, vol. 64.
11.
D. Hibbs, The Partisan Model Of Macroeconomic Cycles: More Theory And Evidence For The United States, „Economics & Politics” 1994, vol. 1.
12.
P. Keefer, DPI2012, Database of Political Institutions: Changes and Variable Definitions, Development Research Group, The World Bank Issued: December 2012.
13.
H. Kitschelt, Z. Mansfeldova, R. Markowski, G. Toka, Postcommunist Party Systems. Competition, Representation and inter Party Cooperation, Cambridge University Press 1999.
14.
R. Markowski, Political parties and ideological spaces in East Central Europe, „Communist and Post-Communist Studies” 1997, vol. 3.
15.
F. Müller-Rommel, K. Fettelschoss, P. Harfst, Party government in Central Eastern European democracies: A data collection (1990–2003), „European Journal of Political Research” 2004, vol. 43.
16.
D. Ost, Illusory Corporatism in Eastern Europe: Neoliberal Tripartism and Postcommunist Class Identities, „Politics and Society” 2000, vol. 4.
17.
E. Palócz, Different trajectories of Central Eastern European countries after the crisis, [w:] G. Gorzelak, G. Chor-Ching, K. Fazekas (red.), Adaptability and Change: The Regional Dimensions in central and Eastern Europe, Warszawa 2012.
18.
A. Przeworski, F. Limongi, Political Regimes and Economic Growth, „The Journal of Economic Perspectives” 1993, vol. 3.
19.
J.E. Roemer, The Strategic Role of Party Ideology When Voters are Uncertain in about How the Economy Works, „The American Political Science Review” 1994, vol. 2.
20.
R. Rose, W.T.E Mishler, Mass Reaction to Regime Change in Eastern Europe: Polarization or Leaders and Laggards? „British Journal of Political Science” 1994, Issue 2.
21.
P. Samecki, Adaptability through change: from misdevelopment to a successful transition in Central Europe, [w:] G. Gorzelak, G. Chor-Ching, K. Fazekas (red.), Adaptability and Change: The Regional Dimensions in central and Eastern Europe, Warszawa 2012.
22.
S. Saxonberg, Post–Communist Welfare Attitudes: Was Czech Exception is a Myth? „East European Quaterly” 2007, vol. 1.
23.
J. Sepioł, Przyszłość Europy Środkowej, [w:] A. Kukliński, J. Woźniak (red.), Transformacja sceny europejskiej i globalnej XXI wieku. Strategie dla Polski, Kraków 2012.
24.
A. Siaroff, Corporatism in 24 industrial democracies: Meaning and measurement, „European Journal of Political Research” 1999, Issue 2.
25.
A. Sikk, How unstable? Volatility and the genuinely new parties in Eastern Europe, „European Journal of Political Research” 2005, Issue 3.
26.
J.M. Sano, J.B. Williamson, Is Corporatism the Answer to Union Decline?: A Cross-National Investigation, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, TBA, New York 2007, online, http://www.allacademic.com/met... (dostęp: 23.06.2012).
27.
O.H. Swank, Popularity functions based on partisan theory, „Public Choice” 1993, Issue 4.
28.
E. Tzelgov, Communist successor parties and government survival in Central Eastern Europe, „European Journal of Political Research” 2011, vol. 4.
30.
UNECE 2013 Statistical Database, compiled from national and international official sources, http://w3.unece.org/pxweb/ (dostęp: 25.04.2013).
31.
M. Vachudova, The Chech republic: The Unexpected Force of Institutional Constrains, [w:] J. Zielonka, A. Pravda (red.), Democratic Consolodation in Eastern Europe. International and Transnational Factors, Oxford University Press 2001.
32.
A. Vatta, The enlargement of the European Union and social dialogue in Central and Eastern Europe, „Perspectives on European Politics and Society” 2001, Issue 1.
33.
A. Volkens, Quantifying the elections programmes. Coding procedures and controls, [w:] I. Budge, H.-D. Klingerman, A. Volkens, J. Bara, E. Tannenbaum (red.), Mapping Policy Preferences. Estimates for Parties, Elections and Governments 1945–1998, Oxford University Press 2001.
Поделиться
Статьи по теме
| ISSN: | 1640-8888 |
Czasopismo naukowe «Studia Politologiczne» uzyskało dofinansowanie z Ministerstwa Edukacji i Nauki w ramach programu „Rozwój Czasopism Naukowych” (projekt numer RCN/SN/0713/2021/1). Wysokość otrzymanego dofinansowania wynosi 79 607 zł. Celem projektu jest realizacja działań zmierzających do podniesienia poziomu praktyk wydawniczych i edytorskich, zwiększenia wpływu Czasopisma na rozwój nauki oraz dalszego zwiększania prestiżu Czasopisma w międzynarodowym obiegu naukowym. Okres realizacji projektu wynosi 24 miesiące.
© 2006-2024 Journal hosting platform by Bentus
Мы используем файлы cookies для улучшения пользовательского интерфейса и анализа трафика.
Данные собираются и обрабатываются нами и Google Analytics (more).
Вы можете изменить настройки cookies в своем браузере. Продолжая использовать сайт, вы соглашаетесь с этими условиями.
Данные собираются и обрабатываются нами и Google Analytics (more).
Вы можете изменить настройки cookies в своем браузере. Продолжая использовать сайт, вы соглашаетесь с этими условиями.
