The issue described in the article relates to the most important british constitutional
convention regulating the functioning of the House of Lords. The following parts
of the article include considerations that are devoted to: 1) explaining the genesis and the theoretical assumptions, 2) the content, and 3) in the present and in the
past appearing doubts as to the application in practice and the validity as well of
the convention. The author’s aim is to show the way that the convention has been
developing the constitutional position of the House of Lords. On the other hand
he tries to rebut an opinion formulated sometimes in the UK, suggesting that the
convention has lost its validity.
PEER REVIEW INFORMATION
Article has been screened for originality
ЛИТЕРАТУРА(14)
1.
Blackburn R., Kennon A., Wheeler-Booth M., Parliament. Functions, Practice and Procedures, London 2003.
Comstock Weston C., Salisbury and the Lords, 1868–1895, [w:] Jones C., Lewis D. (red.), Peers, Politics and Power: The House of Lords, 1603–1911, London 1986.
Rush M., The House of Lords: The Political Context, [w:] Dickson B., Carmichel P. (red.), The House of Lords – its Parliamentary and Judical Roles, Oxford 1999.
Мы используем файлы cookies для улучшения пользовательского интерфейса и анализа трафика. Данные собираются и обрабатываются нами и Google Analytics (more). Вы можете изменить настройки cookies в своем браузере. Продолжая использовать сайт, вы соглашаетесь с этими условиями.