PL EN RU
EU diplomacy 2.0: The European Union’s exercise in soft power in the Philippines through Facebook
 
 
More details
Hide details
1
Assistant Professor of European Studies at the Ateneo de Manila University in the Philippines
 
 
Publication date: 2020-06-15
 
 
Studia Politologiczne 2020;56
 
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
Digital diplomacy, also referred to as e-Diplomacy or Diplomacy 2.0, is a form of public diplomacy that entails the pursuance of foreign policy objectives using the Internet and social media. It is one of the ways that actors in contemporary global politics can exert soft power, thereby shaping a host country’s perceptions, agendas, and policies. The increasing use of digital diplomacy exemplifies a shift in diplomatic from purely government-to-government (G2G) relations, to one in which communication is directed towards publics (G2P), and can even encourage citizens to interact with one another (P2P). One actor that has become increasingly active in this area is the European Union (EU). However, unlike a country, the regional bloc is a coalition of twenty-eight member states. Consequently, the challenge for EU digital diplomacy specialists is to represent a group of countries to local audiences. There is minimal literature on this subject, and this paper hopes to contribute to it by presenting a case study of the EU’s digital diplomacy initiatives towards Philippines, which are communicated through the popular social networking website, Facebook. This paper argues that the EU exercises its soft power through its social media transmissions it creates. The individuals featured in its online content, the way that the European Union represents itself, and the issues it highlights in its posts are all geared towards shaping the perceptions of Philippine audiences.
PEER REVIEW INFORMATION
Article has been screened for originality
peer-reviewed
REFERENCES (17)
1.
C. Bjola, M. Holmes, Digital Diplomacy: Theory and Practice, London: Taylor and Francis 2015.
 
2.
A.F. Cooper, B. Hocking, W. Maley. Global Governance and Diplomacy, London: Palgrave Macmillan 2008.
 
3.
A.F. Cooper, J. Heine, R.C. Thakur (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Modern Diplomacy, Oxford: Oxford University Press 2013.
 
4.
G. Cowan, A. Arsenault, Moving from monologue to dialogue to collaboration. The three lay- ers of public diplomacy, «The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science» 2008, Vol. 616.
 
5.
M.K. Davis Cross, Conceptualizing European Public Diplomacy, [in:] M.K. Davis Cross, J. Melissen (eds.), European Public Diplomacy: Soft Power at Work, New York: Palgrave Macmillan 2013.
 
6.
M.D. Dodd, S.J. Collins, Public relations message strategies and public diplomacy 2.0: An empirical analysis using Central-Eastern European and Western Embassy Twitter accounts, «Public Relations Review» 2017, Vol. 43.
 
7.
B.E. Goldsmith, Y. Horiuchi, Spinning the Globe? U.S. Public Diplomacy and Foreign Public Opinion, «The Journal of Politics» 2009, Vol. 71, No. 3.
 
8.
C. Hayden, Social media at state: power, practice and conceptual limits for US public diplo- macy, «Global Media Journal» 2012, Vol. 21.
 
9.
L. Khatib, W. Dutton, M. Thelwall, Public Diplomacy 2.0: A Case Study of the US Digital Outreach Team, «Middle East Journal» 2012, Vol. 66, No. 3.
 
10.
I. Manor, R. Crilly, Visually framing the Gaza War of 2014: The Israel Ministry of Foreign Affairs on Twitter, «Media, War and Conflict» 2018, Vol. 11, No. 4.
 
11.
J. Melissen, Public Diplomacy, [in:] A.F. Cooper, J. Heine, R.C. Thakur (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Modern Diplomacy, Oxford: Oxford University Press 2013.
 
12.
J. Nye, Public Diplomacy and Soft Power, «The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science» 2008, Vol. 616.
 
13.
J. Nye, Soft power, «Foreign Policy» 1990, Vol. 80.
 
14.
J. Nye, Soft power: The means to success in world politics, New York, NY: Public Affairs 2004.
 
15.
J. Pamment, Digital diplomacy as transmedia engagement: Aligning theories of participatory culture with international advocacy campaigns, «New Media and Society» 2016, Vol. 18, No. 9.
 
16.
S. Park, D. Chung, H.W. Park, Analytical framework for evaluating digital diplomacy using network analysis and topic modelling: Comparing South Korea and Japan, «Information Processing and Management» 2019, Vol. 56.
 
17.
D. Spry, Facebook diplomacy: a data-driven, user-focused approach to Facebook use by diplomatic missions, «Media International Australia» 2018, Vol. 168, No. 1.
 
ISSN:1640-8888
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top