The article is focused on the critical analysis of deliberative democracy. The
fundamental question is: whether deliberation can be a real remedy to the crisis
of representative democracy and its growing problems with legitimacy of power? Strictly defined deliberations can become its own caricature and lead, paradoxically,
to undemocratic effects: exclusion and domination.
PEER REVIEW INFORMATION
Article has been screened for originality
REFERENCES(15)
1.
Benhabib S., Toward a Deliberative Model of Democratic Legitimacy, [w:] Democracy and Difference. Contesting the Boundaries of the Political, Princeton Univeristy Press, Princeton–New Jersey 1996.
Cohen J., Deliberation and Democracy Legitimacy, [w:] A. Hamlin, P. Pettit, B. Blackwell (red.), The Good Polity. Normative Analysis of the State, Oxford 1989.
Johnson J., Arguing for Deliberation: Some Skeptical Considerations, [w:] J. Elster (red.), Deliberative Democracy, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1998.
Saward M., Democratic legitimacy and deliberative theory, [w:] M. Saward (red.), Democratic Innovation. Deliberation, representation and association, Routledge London 2000.
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.