The aim of this article is to verify the thesis that the parties of the Hungarian
minority (SMK, Most-Hid in Slovakia and UDMR in Romania) resist to the
catch-all trend. The period from the first free elections to the 2016 elections has
been analyzed. The thesis has not been confirmed – the Hungarian national minority
parties are catching the catch-all trend, but in the different level. It was shown that
the catch-all strategy was much stronger in the Hungarian minority parties in the
Slovak party system and an attempt was made to clarify this difference.
PEER REVIEW INFORMATION
Article has been screened for originality
REFERENCES(9)
1.
Birnir J., Ethnicity and Electoral Politics, Cambridge 2007.
Ishiyama J., Breuning M., What is in a name? Ethnic party identity and democratic development in post-communist politics, „Party Politics”, 2011, 17/2.
Kasprowicz D., „Europejskimi oczami, z transylwańską duszą” – etnoregionalizm Unii Demokratycznej Węgrów (UDMR) w Rumunii, „Annales Universitatis Paedagogicae” 2013, nr IX.
van Biezen I., On the theory and practice of party formation and adaptation in new democracies, „European Journal of Political Research” 2005, vol. 44.
Wojtas K., Partie etniczne Europy Środkowej w wyborach parlamentarnych i lokalnych. Etnicyzacja systemów partyjnych? [w:] M. Drzonek, M. Musiał-Karg, A. Wołek (red.), Ćwierć wieku polityki lokalnej w Europie Środkowo-Wschodniej, Kraków 2017.
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.