The aim of the article is to present the development of biometric technology as
a consequence of 9/11 terrorist attacks in the USA and issuing the PATRIOT ACT in
2001. Nowadays biometric technology is popular not only in the public security area (e.g.
criminal data bases, face recognition surveillance systems) but is also used in everyday life
(e.g. smartphones with touch ID/face recognition). The article shows both sides of biometric
devices utilization: advantages and potential negative consequences for individuals.
Burton-Harris V., Mayor P., Wrongfully Arrested Because Face Recognition Can’t Tell Black People Apart, https://www.aclu.org/news/priv... (24.01.2022).
Gonçalves M., Gameiro M., Security, privacy and freedom and the EU legal and policy framework for biometrics, «Computer Law & Security Review» 2012, Vol. 28 (3).
Kenney T., ‘I Just Have Big Lips’: Facial Detection System Decried as ‘Racist’ After Rejecting Black Man’s Passport Photo Even Though It Met Required, Standards https://atlantablackstar.com/... decried-as-racist-after-rejecting-black-mans-passport-photo-even-though-it-met-required-standards (24.01.2022).
Li Xan Wong K., Shields Dobson A., We’re just data: Exploring China’s social credit system in relation to digital platform ratings cultures in Westernised democracies, «Global Media and China» 2019, Vol. 4 (2).
Pascu L., Biometric facial recognition hardware present in 90% of smartphones by 2024, biometricupdate.com/202001/biometric-facial-recognition-hardware-present-in-90-of-smartphones-by-2024 (24.01.2022).
Мы используем файлы cookies для улучшения пользовательского интерфейса и анализа трафика. Данные собираются и обрабатываются нами и Google Analytics (more). Вы можете изменить настройки cookies в своем браузере. Продолжая использовать сайт, вы соглашаетесь с этими условиями.